📖 垄断竞争

Economics

I. Lesson Focus

This lesson examines the characteristics of monopolistic competition, its short-run and long-run equilibrium conditions, the resulting inefficiencies, the role of product differentiation and advertising, and how this market structure compares with perfect competition and monopoly. Candidates must be able to calculate equilibrium price and quantity, determine economic profit or loss, identify excess capacity, and evaluate the welfare implications of this market form.

II. The Problem

A popular coffee chain is neither a perfectly competitive street vendor nor a pure monopolist like a dominant national brand. Its lattes differ slightly from competitors in branding, flavor, store design, and service, allowing it to charge a premium. However, if it raises prices too much, customers quickly switch to rivals. How should such a firm with “differentiated but highly substitutable” products set prices? Can it earn positive economic profit in the long run? Does society lose welfare? This lesson systematically answers these core questions.

III. Definition and Characteristics of Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic competition is a market structure with many sellers offering differentiated products, with relatively easy entry and exit. Its four key features are:

1. Large number of firms: Each firm has a small market share and limited influence on market price.
2. Product differentiation: Products differ in quality, branding, packaging, location, or service. This gives each firm a downward-sloping demand curve and some pricing power.
3. Free entry and exit: New firms can enter to capture profits; unprofitable firms can exit.
4. Non-price competition: Firms rely heavily on advertising, branding, and quality improvements.

Compared with perfect competition, product differentiation is the essential distinction. Compared with monopoly, the large number of firms and easy entry drive long-run economic profit to zero.

IV. Short-Run Equilibrium

In the short run, each firm maximizes profit where marginal revenue equals marginal cost ($MR = MC$), then sets price on its demand curve.

• If $P > ATC$, the firm earns positive economic profit.
• If $P = ATC$, economic profit is zero.
• If $P < ATC$ but $P > AVC$, the firm continues operating to minimize losses.

Key relation: Economic profit = $(P - ATC) \times Q$.

V. Long-Run Equilibrium

Because entry is free, short-run economic profits attract new firms, shifting each incumbent’s demand curve leftward until $P = ATC$ and economic profit is eliminated. At this tangency point, the demand curve is tangent to the ATC curve.

Long-run equilibrium satisfies three conditions: 1. $MR = MC$ (profit maximization) 2. $P = ATC$ (zero economic profit) 3. $P > MC$ (allocative inefficiency) 4. Production occurs to the left of minimum ATC (excess capacity)

VI. Efficiency Analysis

Relative to perfect competition, monopolistic competition exhibits two inefficiencies:

• Allocative inefficiency: $P > MC$, so society values additional units more than their marginal cost of production.
• Productive inefficiency: Firms do not produce at minimum ATC, resulting in excess capacity.

Benefits include greater product variety, which increases consumer surplus, and non-price competition (advertising and innovation) that may improve quality and welfare.

VII. The Role and Controversy of Advertising

Monopolistic competitors spend heavily on advertising. Two economic views exist:

• Informative view: Advertising reduces consumer search costs, improves matching, and can lower effective prices.
• Persuasive view: Advertising creates artificial differentiation, builds brand loyalty, makes demand less elastic, increases market power, and leads to higher prices and lower output.

Empirical evidence often shows that advertising-intensive industries in monopolistic competition tend to have higher prices and stronger entry barriers.

Worked Cases

Case 1: Short-Run Profit Calculation

A coffee shop faces demand $P = 12 - 0.5Q$, so $MR = 12 - Q$. Marginal cost is $MC = 2 + 0.4Q$ and $ATC = 4 + 0.2Q$.

Find short-run equilibrium quantity, price, and economic profit.

Solution: 1. Set $MR = MC$: $12 - Q = 2 + 0.4Q \Rightarrow 10 = 1.4Q \Rightarrow Q = 7.14$ 2. Price: $P = 12 - 0.5 \times 7.14 = 8.43$ 3. $ATC = 4 + 0.2 \times 7.14 = 5.43$ 4. Economic profit = $(8.43 - 5.43) \times 7.14 \approx 21.42$

The firm earns positive economic profit in the short run.

Case 2: Long-Run Equilibrium and Excess Capacity

After entry, demand shifts to $P = 10 - 0.6Q$ ($MR = 10 - 1.2Q$). $MC$ and $ATC$ remain unchanged. Find long-run equilibrium output and price, and assess excess capacity.

Solution: 1. $MR = MC$: $10 - 1.2Q = 2 + 0.4Q \Rightarrow Q = 5$ 2. $P = 10 - 0.6 \times 5 = 7$ 3. $ATC = 4 + 0.2 \times 5 = 5$ 4. Further entry continues until $P = ATC$. Assume final equilibrium $P = ATC = 6.5$ at $Q = 5.5$. 5. Under perfect competition the minimum ATC occurs at $Q = 10$. Excess capacity = $10 - 5.5 = 4.5$ units.

Case 3: Advertising Decision

A toothpaste firm in monopolistic competition currently faces $Q_d = 800 - 20P$ with $MC = 2$. A $10$ million advertising campaign (in thousands) shifts demand to $Q_d = 1200 - 15P$. At $P = 20$, should the firm advertise?

Solution: - Without advertising: $Q = 800 - 20\times20 = 400$, profit = $(20-2)\times400 = 7,200$ - With advertising: $Q = 1200 - 15\times20 = 900$, contribution = $(20-2)\times900 = 16,200$ minus $10,000$ advertising = $6,200$ - Short-run profit falls, so advertising appears unprofitable on a pure accounting basis. However, long-term brand equity or further demand growth may justify it. CFA questions require distinguishing short-run profit effects from strategic considerations.

Traps

Key Formulas

• Profit-maximizing condition: $MR = MC$
• Long-run equilibrium: $MR = MC$ and $P = ATC$ (demand tangent to ATC)
• Economic profit = $(P - ATC) \times Q$
• Excess capacity = Output at minimum ATC (perfect competition) − monopolistic competition output
• Markup: $P - MC > 0$
• Demand elasticity falls as perceived differentiation rises, increasing pricing power

Practice Questions

Q1. In monopolistic competition, a firm’s demand curve is:
A. horizontal
B. vertical
C. downward-sloping
D. identical to that of a perfectly competitive firm

Q2. In long-run equilibrium for monopolistic competition, which statement is correct?
A. $P = MC = ATC$
B. $P = ATC$ but $P > MC$
C. $P = MC$ but $P < ATC$
D. The firm earns positive economic profit

Q3. The feature that most clearly distinguishes monopolistic competition from perfect competition is:
A. many sellers
B. product differentiation
C. free entry
D. zero economic profit

Q4. A firm is in short-run equilibrium with $P=15$, $ATC=12$, $MC=8$, $MR=8$. The firm:
A. should increase output
B. should decrease output
C. is maximizing profit and earning economic profit
D. is incurring losses

Q5. The fundamental reason monopolistic competition produces excess capacity in the long run is:
A. $MR = MC$
B. the demand curve is tangent to ATC to the left of its minimum
C. high barriers to entry
D. excessive advertising expenditure

Q6. Which statement about advertising in monopolistic competition is false?
A. It may increase perceived product differentiation
B. It necessarily reduces social welfare
C. It can lower consumers’ search costs
D. It can make demand less elastic

Q7. A monopolistically competitive firm produces 80 units in long-run equilibrium. The same cost structure under perfect competition would minimize ATC at 100 units. Excess capacity equals:
A. 20 units
B. 80 units
C. 100 units
D. cannot be determined

Q8. Compared with perfect competition, a monopolistically competitive market typically:
A. offers fewer product varieties
B. sells at lower prices
C. produces at minimum ATC
D. offers more product varieties but sets price above marginal cost

Answers

Takeaways

• Monopolistic competition combines many firms, differentiated products, easy entry, and downward-sloping demand.
• Short run allows positive or negative economic profit; long run forces $P = ATC$ through entry/exit.
• Long-run equilibrium always features $P > MC$ (allocative inefficiency) and excess capacity (productive inefficiency).
• Advertising can be informative or persuasive; its net welfare effect depends on the specific case.
• Compared with perfect competition, monopolistic competition supplies more product variety but at higher prices and lower individual firm output.